National Geographic in the palm of your hand

Posted in This Just In... on December 30th, 2009 by gkrakow

I hope you haven”t been saving all your old National Geographic magazines.

I mean, they’re nice to have and flip through but they can become dust collectors and take up a lot of space.

Plus, now it turns out that you really didn’t have to save them in the first place.

That’s because National Geographic has just released everything – and I mean everything – on a portable hard drive.

Nat GeoFor $199.99, you can now own the entire collection of National Geographic Magazines ever published and it comes to you in one, neat 160GB hard drive.

In Nat Geo’s words:

“Explore 120 years of amazing discoveries, fascinating maps, and the world’s best photography with The Complete National Geographic.

This definitive collection of every issue of National Geographic magazine, digitally reproduced in stunning high resolution, brings you the world and all that is in it. Use the advanced interface to explore a topic, search for photographs, browse the globe, or wander on your own expedition.

Access all of the maps, photos, and magazine issues found on the DVD collection in one external hard drive. Browse and search the entire collection without needing to swap out DVDs.

Lightweight and travel-friendly, the hard drive is just 3″ x 5″ and requires only a USB connection.”

Best of all, the Nat Geo people used only 60GB of the available space on the hard drive leaving plenty of room to accommodate future upgrades (or for your digital collection of True Detective and Mad magazines).

Too bad the collection didn’t make it in time for Christmas – but, I’m guessing that there’s never a wrong time for a gift like this.

But, if you don’t mind swapping out discuss, there’s a Complete National Geographic Collection available on six DVDs for $89.95 (Deluxe Edition with a personalized disc holder) or $59.95 (for the Standard Edition).

iPhone problems: Not just for AT&T

Posted in News on December 29th, 2009 by gkrakow

I first reported this problem weeks ago. My friend Frank Cioffi of AppleInvestorNews has also written about it. And now, the All Things Digital blog seems to have figured it out as well.

Copyright Apple 2009

COpyright Apple 2009

All of the reported problems that iPhone owners have with dropped calls and missing wireless signal strength is not just a problem for AT&T customers here in the New York area (and other big cities). The same thing is happening with iPhone users in London on the the U.K.’s O2 network.

Big cities. Lots of cutting-edge users. Completely different frequency bands. But – the same problem.

Maybe it’s time to admit that this is not centered with the cellular networks involved – but with the iPhone itself.

iPhone users in less crowded areas seem to have fewer problems. People using different 3G phones on those same networks have fewer problems. But in large urban areas – big problems.

A few weeks ago AT&T apologized to users and announced they were adding new cell towers in congested Manhattan areas. For the most part I haven’t heard many iPhone users say their service has improved.

As a matter of fact, my friend Robin, a super user, has given-up on his iPhone and switched to a Verizon Droid. At least we can now complete a phone call in one try. Other iPhone users I know also carry second phones (a Palm Pre, Android, etc.) to use while they’re in Manhattan.

Yesterday, O2 apologized to users and announced they were adding new cell towers in London. I hope they have better luck with this emergency fix. Not sure they will though.

The fault appears to lie with the iPhone itself. It seems like iPhones put an overly-huge demand on cellular systems compared to all other smartphones. It’s something that was lees of a problem when iPhones used more robust 2G and 2.5G data frequencies. 3G iPhones put a huge strain on the system. In large urban areas – the strain is palpable.

Should AT&T, O2 and others spend hundreds of millions on new 3G cell towers to solve the problem? Or should they focus their efforts/money on constructing new, faster 4G networks for smartphone devices of the future?

Maybe Apple could figure out exactly where the problem lies – and help fix it – before the next generation of iPhone is announced in 2010.

Or, based on the idea that most young people don’t make voice calls anymore and have little need for monthly cellular contracts (except for data) Apple should continue to improve their iPod Touch and the buying public should begin realizing that the Touch will be the basis for Apple’s future communications/portable computing devices.

The best headphones under $100

Posted in News on December 23rd, 2009 by gkrakow

Apple – with their iPod devices and iTunes Music Store – has made music very portable. That’s just about the only compliment I can muster.

Without going into long rants – you have to admit that they have revolutionized the entire music industry – from top to bottom – with their theory that file size is more important than the way music sounds. Many people think that’s a good thing.

I don’t. I think they’ve set music reproduction back decades. Beginning in the 1950’s, the goal was to improve the personal music experience outside of concert halls. The idea was to faithfully capture and reproduce performances.

Apple (and other early portable player pioneers) made sure that the switch to digital music meant that you could “dumb down” the music into tiny files – and then fit thousands of those files on one of their devices. Didn’t (and doesn’t) matter what those files sound like – just that you can fit ever-increasing numbers of them in smaller and smaller spaces.

As for the hardware, Apple has always included a pair of horrible-sounding earplugs with their portable music players. I call them plugs because they do more to block musical sounds than reproduce them properly.

For people who buy iPods and think those earplugs must be good because Apple includes them – I’m here to tell you that they don’t. They sound like crap.

Luckily you can do something about it. There are an ever-increasing number of models of earphones (in-ear designs) and headphones (next to or on top of your ear) that sound amazingly good. So good that you will probably be forced to “rip” you own digital tunes at higher-bit rates because you’ll hear just how crappy 128K downloaded files really sound.

Over the past few weeks I’ve been gathering more than a dozen new designs for a single holiday buying-guide piece. I’ve narrowed down my choices to 6 or so designs that are worth your time to listen to. I’ve split them into two groups. This report will be my favorites that sell for less than $100. Part two will include the best of the new models that sell for more than $100.

PX_200_II

Sennheiser PX 100-II. In the early days of hi-fi headphones were large, heavy and actually sounded that way. They were nicknamed “cans for a good reason. Back then I remember trying a number of different models and disliked them all.

But near the end of the 60’s a German company known for their professional microphones, Sennheiser, released their model HD 400 “open” headphones. These very lightweight, gray headphones had bright yellow foam earpads that sat directly on the outside of your ears. They were comfortable, cheap and sounded as good as – or better – than most other headphones of the day. Sennheiser must have sold a gazillion of them.

Fast forward a few decades to modern times. Sennheiser makes all types and styles of headphones and earphones but – true to their past – they still make an inexpensive “open” model that’s pretty terrific.

The PX 100 II folds to fit neatly in a nice, black fabric carrying pouch (included) and sounds pretty terrific.

If I had to classify the sound I’d say airy with super-duper bass – just about perfect for listening to modern-day digital files. On better quality source material the PX 100 IIs you’re more aware of the tremendously boosted bass – but since Sennheiser engineers are great at what they do – the sound is still very, very enjoyable.

A pair of PX 100 IIs come in black or white and will set you back $70 or so from local, national and online retailers.

PX_200_II

Sennheiser PX 200 II. Next in line, the 200 II is a “closed” headphone design. That means it’s made to keep most of the sound “inside”.

The 200 IIs has very comfortable leatherette ear pads which the company boast “provide excellent isolation”. I wouldn’t go that far. They do block some ambient sound but during a trial run on a cross-country flight I wished I had a pair of either in-ear or noise-cancelling “phones”.

Overall, the 200 IIs sound a bit more refined than the 100 IIs – exactly what you would expect from the difference in model numbers and price. The biggest difference is that the bass is NOT boosted in the 200 IIs fo that the sound quality is flatter and seeming has more extended treble reproduction.

When not flying, the PX 200 IIs were extremely comfortable to use and sounded absolutely terrific – rivaling many modern headphone designs costing 3 or 4 times the price.

The PX 200 IIs come in black or white and include a fabric carrying case and can be had for $90 or less from local, national and online retailers.

NuForce UF-30. NuForce, the California company that makes some terrific sounding, expensive hi-fi amplifiers and equipment is now also making a line on modestly priced, portable amplifiers, speakers and headphones. The UF-30s are their top-of-the-line model made in collaboration with German company, Ultrasone.
nuforce uf30


Ultrasone developed what they call their S-logic Natural Sound technology which is said to allow headphones to reproduce music more like we hear music without headphones (so that voices don’t sound like they come from the middle of your brain). NuForce decided to tweak Ultrasone’s invention for their UF-30s.

The result is a very stylish (red, pearl or black), lightweight headphone which sounds very, very good. They are very comfortable to wear for long periods of listening.

Personally, I don’t hear much difference between what S-logic does compared to other, similarly-priced headsets – but the overall effect doesn’t take anything away from the sounds quality.

High-end treble sounds (like cymbals) are not as smooth as other designs in the UF-30’s price range, but you are not likely to notice if you primarily listen to compromised digital files.

UF-30s come with a wonderful, “hard-shell” protective carry case and sell for $70. They are available on the NuForce Website and other online retailers.

Where art thou, “Google Phone”?

Posted in News on December 15th, 2009 by gkrakow

When I discuss a Google phone I’m not talking about all the current smartphones which run some variant of Google’s Android operating system. What we’re discussing here is a phone that actually might be branded the “Google Phone”.

In the past few days the some technology blog sites have been totally gaga over a few non-descript photos of a candy-bar-shaped smartphone, made by HTC (they currently make a large number of Android phones for Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon).

HTC's Bravo smartphone

HTC's Bravo smartphone

The now-legendary “Google Phone” handset may or may not be called the first true Google phone or maybe the HTC Nexus One.

It may or may not run a future version of the Android OS. If you’re keeping track, Verizon’s Droid is currently running 2.0.1, T-Mobile’s G-1 is running 1.6 and their CLIQ runs 1.5, etc. You get the idea – it’s all somewhat confusing not only for industry pundits but for the general buying public as well.

Here’s what we know.: According to many published reports a whole bunch of these new Google/Nexus One phones were handed out to Google employees last Friday. They are said to be manufactured by HTC and are running what is being termed Android OS 2.1.

In some of the spy photos the “Google Phone” looks like some other HTC smartphones (Bravo/Dragon/Passion) and includes a bunch of futuristic hardware (Qualcomm’s super Snapdragon processor, a 3.7-inch (diagonal) display, an on-screen QWERTY keyboard a 5 megapixel camera and lots more).

There have been all sorts of unconfirmed reports that the phone contains 3G hardware for use on T-Mobile’s network – and also 3G hardware for AT&T’s 3G networks.

There are unconfirmed reports that the phone will be sold in an unlocked form (meaning there will be no subsidies from cellular operators in return for agreeing to a monthly contract) for upwards of $500.

There are unconfirmed reports that the phone – in the sense that you’ll make standard cellular calls on cellular networks – might only allow you to make VoIP – or Internet-based calls.

Everyone seems to have an opinion on what this “Google/Nexus One” handset is all about. Here’s my educated guess:

I think this device is really a developer’s platform. Of course they handed it out to Google employees to play with. It’s a cheap way to have some very smart people test the device for problems.

Google has done this in the past. There have reportedly been at least two other “Google” phones handed to employees to play with. Both have gone on to be working Android models. I expect they’re doing the same thing to make sure everything works smoothly on the new Snapdragon hardware platform.

Using employees to troubleshoot products is not a Google-only idea. I can tell you from first-hand knowledge that every version of a Microsoft operating system and/or office suite is tested by employees company-wide. I’m sure others do it too. It makes total sense.

In that case, what we have here is a company letting employees road test a next-gen product so that problems can be ironed out before a paying customer ever has to deal with it.

That said, having seen the super-fast Snapdragon processor in action (back in February at 3GSM in Barcelona) the next generation of Android phones, Windows Mobile phones (check out AT&T’s upcoming LG eXpo smartphone with optional, snap-on pico projector) and possibly even the iPhone. If Apple is busy overhauling the design for year four they should seriously be thinking of using a Snapdragon chip.

The bottom line? Expect smartphones to get much smarter – and much faster – in the very near future.

Whether it’s real or not, this device is bound to be the hottest topic at the upcoming Consumer Electronics confab in Las Vegas, next month. We’ll see.

Chrome browser comes to Linux, OS X

Posted in This Just In... on December 8th, 2009 by gkrakow

Chrome page

While we’re still on the subject of Google – have you ever tried their Web browser for big computers?

Google Chrome is a terrific alternative to Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, Netscape’s Navigator or Firefox or Apple’s Safari.

But, until now, Chrome has been limited to the 90+% of all computer users whose machines run on Microsoft Windows (XP, Vista and 7). Not anymore.

As of today, a Beta version of Google Chrome is now available for Apple’s Unix-based Mac OS X and various forms of Linux (Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora/openSUSE). Beta means not everything works the way they’d like it to at the moment. But Google is proud of their product so far – and wants you to see just how far they’ve come so far.

The Google Chrome Web browser for Windows has always been known for speed and the new Beta versions are no exception. Not only does Chrome start faster than any other popular browser – but, nine times out of ten, it seems to load Websites and give you search results faster than other contenders.

Chrome also allows you to change your browser’s “look” with downloadable (and easily installable) style forms.

But the biggest of big deals is how Chrome integrates your search and navigation Web pages on the same page. It does so with user-configurable tabs which allow you to navigate to your favorite Web pages with just one click on a thumbnail of your most visited sites.

This is how Google explains their new tab page:

Chrome browser for Linux uses 60,000 lines of code written specifically for Linux – and has gone through 23 developer builds and 2,713 bug fixes (so far). The Google people are quite proud of their Beta software.

In a quick test, the Chrome Web browser installed in less than 45-seconds on my Lenovo netbook running the latest version of Ubuntu’s OS (version 9.10). I pressed one button and everything just installed perfectly (a far cry from what Linux installations used to be.)

Speed-wise, Chrome runs rings around Ubuntu’s standard Firefox browser. After a few hours use, I can say that so far, so good. It seems pretty stable and a joy to
use. Pretty good for Beta software.

The Chrome Web browser is the main building block for Google’s upcoming, Linux-based Chrome operating system. You should try it out now and start to get used to it. You’ll probably be seeing a whole lot more of Chrome on new devices in the very near future.

Google Goggles boggles the mind

Posted in This Just In... on December 7th, 2009 by gkrakow

Forget about searching by typing in a word or a phrase… or saying something and having your smartphone understand what you said and starting a search in that manner. That’s so passé.

Today, Google released a revolutionary new program for Android phones that does searches by examining photographs and live pictures of objects.

The new software is called Google Goggles. It allows you to take pictures with your Android phone’s camera to search the Web. They say it’s great for “things that aren’t easy to describe in words.”

Goggles works better with certain types of searches – like books, DVDs, landmarks, logos, business cards, artwork businesses, products, barcodes, and even text.

Goggles is not so good at resolving information about animals, plants, cars, furniture or clothing.

It’s fun watching Goggles do its thing. You take a photograph and the software scans back in forth (in blue) and tries to figure out what it’s looking at. Very cool.

In my early tests, the software can understand some things that I’ve pointed it towards – such as barcodes and product boxes – and not so good with other items (other cell phones, electronic equipment and my dog, Orangina). I’ll let you know if I have more luck with the software outdoors.

Google Goggles is very new software and should continue to evolve in the near future. I intend to try it with everything I find close-by but you’ll probably think of many more uses than I can come up with.

Goggles is available now for download via the Android Market app store.

Try it and let me know what you think.

Yo Yo Ma. CSO. Amazing broadcast

Posted in News on December 3rd, 2009 by gkrakow

Last night I was witness to an incredible event in Denver – a terrific concert – and an even more notable live radio broadcast of that concert.

The Colorado Symphony Orchestra, under the direction of conductor Julian Kuerti, performed an entire Antoin Dvorak program. The featured, guest artist was superstar cellist Yo Yo Ma who performed Dvorak’s Cello Concerto in B Minor, Opus 104.

The concert, at Denver’ Boettcher Concert Hall was a complete sell-out. That’s a good thing because the CSO is facing very hard economic times – just like many other music institutions (and the industry as a whole) all around the country.

Last night’s performance was part of a huge fundraising effort for the symphony orchestra – culminating in a three-day, on-air pledge drive. The radio stations weren’t asking for money to help pubic radio – they sought and received contributions ($600,000+ at last count) to help keep the orchestra afloat. The stations had to get special dispensation from the FCC to raise funds for a third-party institution.

The concert was broadcast live over Denver’s public radio stations: KVOD (the classical music station at 88.1 on the dial) and KFCR (usually the jazz station at 90.1) and more than five dozen other public radio stations around Colorado.

The 21st Century broadcast technologies that were used will be the subject of a more detailed future article. What you should know is that it took hundreds of man-hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of of the highest-tech equipment to provide listeners with the best-sounding mono, stereo and especially 5.1-surround sound reproduction of a live concert that I’ve ever witnessed. Kudos to Mike Pappas and David Day for engineering an amazing feat.

I was lucky enough to be able to witness Wednesday’s dress rehearsal from one of the best seats in the house. I got to hear Mr. Ma perform the Allegro moderato – the final movement of Dvorak’s Cello Concerto in B minor, Opus 104. – a portion of which I’m sharing below.

 

By the way, the live performance, Wednesday night was even better than the rehearsal. Bravo!

“Urgent” CLIQ update from Motorola?

Posted in This Just In... on December 2nd, 2009 by gkrakow

Cliq

I was surprised to see an “urgent” warning plastered across the screen of my Motorola’s CLIQ smartphone current being used in a long-term test of Android phones.

To say that the word “urgent” disturbed me is an understatement.

Each and every Android phone I’ve tested – and they’re all similar but slightly different in the user experience they provide – have the ability to be updated wirelessly.

But at no time did any of them actually say the update installation was urgent.

I’ve never really had problems with the CLIQ. It has always been able to make phone calls, handle my written communications and generally act like a modern-day smartphone. I mean I’d love it to handle all functions a little faster – and maybe have the screen react a little faster and more accurately to my touch commands – but overall that could be said about nearly all the Android phones so far.

But that on-screen warning made me stop what I was doing, plug in the power supply and let the Android system do it’s thing. Ten minutes later, the CLIQ was back up and running again.

At first I couldn’t tell much of a difference. Nothing was changed so radically that the actual DNA of Motorola’s phone had changed. But, after a few hours of use I started to realize that the touch screen had improved a bit (especially when typing on the on-screen keyboard), and that the phone seemed to handle data a tiny drop faster, overall. At the end of the day the battery indicator seemed to say that there was a bit more life left I had become used to.

I asked the T-Mobile people exactly what had been done and they explained it this way:

Over the next several days Motorola CLIQ users will receive an over-the-air (OTA) update to their MOTOBLUR device software.

As we’ve previously communicated, from time to time Motorola will provide OTA updates to improve and enhance the overall consumer experience for CLIQ.

One of the key benefits of MOTOBLUR is the ability to improve current features and add new ones to the device.

In this case, we listened to consumer feedback to make some improvements. CLIQ users can expect to experience the following after accepting and installing the update:

New Battery Management Feature (including better battery performance
Better Touch Screen Accuracy
Better Bluetooth and E-mail Connectivity

I’m not sure exactly what was so urgent about all of this but I can tell you that the upgrade makes a difference. If you own a CLIQ accept the software upgrade and do it!

And if you own a different smartphone from a different manufacturer – check every two-to-four weeks to see if there’s a software update for you articular model. You should find a setting/icon to do so somewhere in the settings section of your device.

Don’t forget these new smartphones are all still works in progress.